.svg){kind=small}
Jun-2026
Sales
Trend
6-Month
Product Count
SKUs
Avg Price
YoY Sales Change
YoY Price Change
Market Insights Snapshot
In June 2026, Buckeye Relief’s mix tilted further away from Flower as category share in Flower sat at 57.85% with sales down 19.45% year over year and 1.33% month over month, while Vapor Pens climbed to 26.03% share on 44.50% year-over-year growth and 9.02% month-over-month growth. Pre-Roll held 12.41% share but fell 29.99% month over month with no year-over-year comparison, and Edible, though just 3.31% share, expanded 887.98% year over year and 22.56% month over month; Concentrates remained 0.41% share with a 68.73% year-over-year decline but a 171.76% month-over-month spike. With overall brand sales up 9.32% year over year and average price down 42.13%, the pattern implies Buckeye Relief is trading customers from higher-priced Flower toward lower-priced, faster-growing formats, especially Vapor Pens and Edibles, to sustain volume.
These shifts reposition Buckeye Relief toward a more mixed inhalables-and-value portfolio anchored by Vapor Pens momentum and opportunistic Edibles trial, while Flower maintains scale but softens; the rank of 4 in Flower within Ohio underscores reliance on a category that is shrinking 19.45% year over year for the brand even as Vapor Pens expand 44.50%. The 29.99% month-over-month contraction in Pre-Roll alongside a 171.76% month-over-month rebound in Concentrates suggests resource rebalancing toward formats with quicker velocity, and the 22.56% month-over-month gain in Edibles indicates incremental baskets at a lower price point. The implication is a near-term positioning that prioritizes penetration-led growth via lower average prices and category diversification to offset Flower drag while retaining Flower scale to support the brand’s rank in Ohio.
Competitive Landscape
Buckeye Relief sits at rank #4 in OH Flower in June 2026, down 2 positions year over year but just 1 spot below its March 2026 rank of #3; despite a peak at #1 in April 2026, the brand’s current #4 marks a 3-place slide from that peak. In contrast, Klutch Cannabis climbed to #1 with a 20-place YoY rank gain and 304.8% YoY sales growth, while RYTHM advanced to #3 with a 6-rank YoY improvement and 67.7% YoY sales growth; meanwhile, Riviera Creek holds #2 despite a 1-rank YoY rise coupled with a -22.7% YoY sales change, indicating rank fluidity not fully aligned with sales momentum. The juxtaposition of Buckeye Relief’s fall from #1 in April 2026 to #4 in June 2026 and competitors’ upward mobility implies that Buckeye Relief’s rank trajectory reflects pressure from faster-moving peers and the need to stabilize share against brands converting momentum into sustained rank gains.
Notable Products
With no SKU posting a month-over-month gain above 50% or a decline below -10% in June 2026, the headline shifts to concentration: three gummy bar SKUs occupy ranks 1–3 while Pre-Rolls hold ranks 4, 6–8, indicating a barbell between Edibles and Pre-Rolls. Cherry Gummy Bar 10-Pack (100mg) rose 29.8% to rank 1 while Grape Gummy Bar 10-Pack (100mg) climbed 29.0% at rank 2, and Orange Gummy Bar 10-Pack (100mg) added 15.0% at rank 3, implying Edibles are consolidating share at the very top. In contrast, Garlic Breath 2.0 Pre-Roll 5-Pack (2.5g) in rank 7 inched up 6.8% while Flower mainstays sit lower at ranks 5, 9, and 10 despite larger dollar volumes like Blueberry Funk (3.5g) at $115,635, pointing to velocity-led leadership over ticket size. The pattern implies Buckeye Relief is leaning into high-frequency Edibles and multi-pack Pre-Rolls to drive rank momentum while Flower anchors revenue but cedes positional dominance.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.
