.svg){kind=small}
Sep-2026
Sales
Trend
6-Month
Product Count
SKUs
Avg Price
YoY Sales Change
YoY Price Change
Where to Buy
Daze Off is stocked at 331 licensed dispensaries across California, Illinois, and Arizona, 166 of them in California, with the deepest coverage in San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, and Santa Rosa. Search by ZIP code or city below to find the closest one, or filter by product type if you are after a specific format.
Market Insights Snapshot
Daze Off concentrated 60.76% of September 2026 sales in Flower, where year-over-year declined 4.84% and month-over-month slipped 3.57%, while Pre-Roll expanded to 17.55% share with 37.76% YoY growth and 3.66% MoM. Vapor Pens contracted to 12.58% share with a 34.28% YoY drop and a 28.57% MoM decline, contrasted by Edible at 5.24% share with 39.04% YoY growth but a 13.48% MoM pullback, and Beverage at 3.87% share with 25.34% YoY and 6.86% MoM gains. With an average price down 23.17% YoY to $21.02 and Flower ranked 5th in Illinois, the mix signals a pivot from higher-ticket inhalables toward value-leaning formats where unit elasticity is supporting Pre-Roll and Beverage gains despite Flower softness.
The mix shift implies Daze Off is trading volume into lower price bands: Flower’s 4.84% YoY and 3.57% MoM declines alongside a 23.17% YoY price compression align with Vapor Pens’ 34.28% YoY and 28.57% MoM declines, indicating margin pressure if reliance on inhalables continues. Concurrently, Pre-Roll’s 37.76% YoY and 3.66% MoM growth plus Beverage’s 25.34% YoY and 6.86% MoM lift point to demand pooling at accessible price points, suggesting positioning headroom in value-tier multipacks and sessionable formats; the 5th-place Flower rank in Illinois anchors core visibility, but sustaining share likely depends on leaning into Pre-Roll attachment and Beverage trial to buffer inhalable volatility.
Competitive Landscape
Daze Off sits at rank #5 in Illinois Flower in September 2026, down 2 positions year over year from #3, with a flat 3-month placement holding at #5 while its peak rank of #3 came in April 2026; by contrast, High Supply / Supply holds #1 despite a -2.53% year-over-year sales change, and The Botanist surged to #4 from #27 alongside a 494.96% year-over-year sales increase. Meanwhile, RYTHM maintains #2 with 22.05% year-over-year growth and Good Green advances to #3 from #4 with 33.81% growth, placing Daze Off between rivals whose ranks are either stable at the top or accelerating upward; the pattern implies Daze Off’s downward YoY rank shift and unchanged 3-month rank reflect share pressure from faster-rising peers, and without a reversal the brand risks sliding further from its April 2026 peak.
Notable Products
Sativa Blend Nug Roll Pre-Roll (0.5g) posted the standout move with +72.5% MoM to rank 2, while Taste Buds - Blue Radberry Gummies 10-Pack (100mg) fell -26.6% MoM and slid to rank 5; together these shifts indicate shopper trade-up from confections to ready-to-smoke formats. At rank 1, Taste Buds - THC/CBN 2:1 Moondrop Grape Gummies 10-Pack (100mg THC, 50mg CBN) grew +4.9% MoM, but Pre-Roll now accounts for two of the top ten ranks 2 and 9, contrasting with Edible softness and signaling a pivot toward faster-onset occasions. Beverage concentration is material with four of the top ten in September 2026, including one CBD/THC 2:1 SKU up +15.9% MoM at rank 6 alongside a Blue Radberry Shot down -3.5% at rank 3, suggesting functional diversity is helping beverages hold share despite mixed momentum. The product mix implies Daze Off is tilting toward immediacy and function-forward formats, prioritizing Pre-Roll velocity and targeted cannabinoid ratios over broader candy breadth.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.
