Mountain High Suckers

Data Snapshot: Apr 06, 2026
Mountain High Suckers Cannabis Brand Logo
<$50K

Mar-2026

Sales

Decline

Trend

6-Month

48

Product Count

SKUs

Mountain High Suckers

Overview

Markets

Mountain High Suckers Locations

Product Trends

Mountain High Suckers Categories

Mountain High Suckers Sales

Market Insights Snapshot

Mountain High Suckers Historical Sales by Category

Mountain High Suckers has shown a fluctuating performance in the Colorado market within the edible category. Over the span of four months, from December 2025 to March 2026, the brand has consistently hovered around the 28th rank, briefly dropping out of the top 30 in February 2026. This movement suggests a level of volatility in their sales performance, which could be attributed to various factors such as market competition or seasonal demand. In December 2025, they achieved a sales figure of 23,651, but this number saw a decline in the following months, particularly in January and February, before showing a slight recovery in March.

While Mountain High Suckers has managed to maintain a presence in the top 30 in Colorado for most of the observed period, the brief absence in February 2026 highlights a potential area of concern for the brand. This dip out of the rankings could indicate a need for strategic adjustments to regain and sustain their position. Despite this, the rebound to the 28th position in March suggests resilience and the potential for improvement. Observing these patterns can offer insights into how Mountain High Suckers might strategize to enhance their market presence and compete more effectively in the edible category.

Mar-2026 Rank
Edible
28
Mountain High Suckers

Competitive Landscape

In the competitive landscape of the Colorado edible market, Mountain High Suckers has experienced some fluctuations in its ranking and sales performance from December 2025 to March 2026. Despite starting at rank 28 in December 2025, the brand saw a dip to rank 31 in February 2026, before recovering to its original position by March 2026. This volatility contrasts with competitors like Canyon, which maintained a relatively stable ranking, hovering between 26 and 31 during the same period. Meanwhile, Binske showed a strong performance, climbing from rank 29 in December 2025 to 26 in January 2026, before dropping out of the top 20 in February and March. ROBHOTS demonstrated a consistent upward trend, improving from rank 34 in December 2025 to 26 by March 2026. Sinsere experienced a decline, moving from rank 24 in December 2025 to 29 in March 2026. These movements suggest that while Mountain High Suckers faces challenges in maintaining a stable position, it remains competitive amidst fluctuating market dynamics, with opportunities to capitalize on the declining trends of some competitors.

Mountain High Suckers market ranking for CO Edible

Mountain High Suckers

Notable Products

```html

In March 2026, the top-performing product from Mountain High Suckers was the Caramel Apple Sucker (10mg), maintaining its leading position from February. The Lozenges Large (100mg) secured the second spot, a new entry in the rankings. The Grape Lozenge (10mg) improved its position to third, up from fifth in February. The Pineapple Rosin Sucker (10mg) held steady at fourth place since its debut in February. Notably, the CBD/THC Cherry Lollipop (3mg CBD, 10mg THC), which was the top seller in December 2025, has dropped to fifth place with sales figures decreasing to 153 units in March.

```
Product Rank
Category
Dec-2025
Jan-2026
Feb-2026
Mar-2026
Caramel Apple Sucker (10mg)
Edible
4
3
1
1
Lozenges Large (100mg)
Edible
>5
>5
>5
2
Grape Lozenge (10mg)
Edible
5
4
5
3
Pineapple Rosin Sucker (10mg)
Edible
>5
>5
4
4
CBD/THC Cherry Lollipop (3mg CBD, 10mg THC)
Edible
1
2
3
5
View product & sales data

Top Selling Cannabis Brands

Simple, transparent pricing that grows with you.
Research the top cannabis brands across markets in the US and Canada.

Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.

Header image
User rating
start Today
Stay ahead of the competition with real-time market data insights.

Discover How Your Brand Stacks Up in the Market