.svg){kind=small}
Where to Buy
Mountain High Suckers is stocked at 138 licensed dispensaries across Colorado and New York, 136 of them in Colorado, with the deepest coverage in Denver, Colorado Springs, Boulder, Golden, and Grand Junction. Search by ZIP code or city below to find the closest one, or filter by product type if you are after a specific format.
Market Insights Snapshot
In July 2026, Mountain High Suckers operated as a single-category brand with Edible accounting for 100.0% of sales and posting a -60.15% year-over-year decline alongside a -10.42% month-over-month dip, while the average price fell -7.07% YoY to $5.18. Within Colorado Edibles, the brand sat at rank 31, indicating a lower-tier placement relative to peers in July 2026 as the all-Edible concentration amplified exposure to a category-specific downswing; the pattern implies that category concentration is magnifying volatility and holding back share recovery.
The combination of a -60.15% YoY contraction in Edible sales and a -10.42% MoM step-down, paired with a -7.07% YoY price reduction, signals a tilt toward value-seeking buyers rather than portfolio breadth, while a rank of 31 in Colorado Edibles underscores limited shelf leverage versus the broader set. With 100.0% of volume tied to Edibles and no offset from other form factors, the brand’s positioning is skewed toward price-sensitive demand where further price moves may yield diminishing returns, implying that mix diversification or premium pack tactics would be required to lift rank and stabilize month-over-month swings.
Competitive Landscape
Mountain High Suckers sits at rank 31 in Colorado Edible for July 2026, unchanged YoY from rank 31, while slipping 1 position versus April 2026 when it was rank 30; that flat YoY rank alongside a 4-position gap from its peak at rank 27 in October 2025 points to stalled relative momentum as faster movers reshuffle the top tier. By contrast, Dialed In Gummies climbed from rank 3 to rank 2 YoY as sales grew 15.8%, whereas Wana moved down from rank 2 to rank 3 with a 16.2% sales decline, and category leader Wyld held rank 1 despite a 24.4% sales drop; this mix of upward and downward movements among leaders, alongside Mountain High Suckers’ unchanged rank and a 1-position slide versus three months prior, implies the brand is neither capturing share from weakening incumbents nor benefitting from growth pockets, signaling a need to reposition within niches where mid-pack volatility can convert rank stability into upward mobility.
Notable Products
Mango Rosin Sucker (10mg) posted the steepest decline in July 2026 at -58.1% and slid to rank 10, while Lemon Sucker (10mg) fell -49.6% at rank 9; against that backdrop, Caramel Apple Sucker (10mg) surged +54.6% into rank 6 and CBD/THC Cherry Lollipop (3mg CBD, 10mg THC) climbed +45.8% to rank 2. Lozenges Large (100mg) held rank 1 with +17.1% MoM, but Sweet Pieces (100mg) dropped -28.6% at rank 3, and Josh Blue's Dream - CBD/THC 3:10 Watermelon Sucker (3mg CBD, 10mg THC) declined -11.0% at rank 7; eight of the top ten are Sucker SKUs, concentrating risk in a single edible format. The dispersion between double‑digit gains and steep declines implies a portfolio pivot toward a few fast-moving Sucker flavors while legacy or niche Rosin variants are being deprioritized, signaling a need to rebalance flavor breadth within the Sucker-heavy mix.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.
