.svg){kind=small}
Apr-2025
Sales
Trend
6-Month
Product Count
SKUs
Overview
Market Insights Snapshot
Progressive Treatment Solutions (PTS) has shown varying performance across different categories and states. In Arizona, PTS's Flower category experienced significant fluctuations. Starting the year ranked 22nd in January, the brand saw a steep decline to 69th place by March, before making a comeback to 27th in April. This rollercoaster in ranking is mirrored by their sales, which initially dropped sharply but then recovered to a respectable level in April. The absence of PTS in the top 30 rankings for February and March suggests challenges in maintaining consistent market presence, which could be an area of focus for the brand moving forward.
In Illinois, PTS's performance in the Concentrates category is noteworthy for its absence in the top 30 rankings until March when it debuted at 37th place. This late entry could indicate a strategic push into this category, or it might reflect a competitive environment where breaking into the top ranks is challenging. Meanwhile, in the Flower category, PTS maintained a steadier presence, hovering around the 60s and 70s in the rankings throughout the first four months of the year. This consistency, albeit at a lower rank, might suggest a stable niche market or customer base that the brand serves in Illinois. However, the lack of significant upward movement could be a signal to explore growth opportunities or differentiation strategies in this state.
Competitive Landscape
In the competitive landscape of the Arizona flower category, PTS (Progressive Treatment Solutions) has experienced notable fluctuations in its market position from January to April 2025. Starting at rank 22 in January, PTS saw a significant drop to rank 69 in March before rebounding to rank 27 in April. This volatility suggests challenges in maintaining consistent sales performance, as evidenced by the initial sales figure of $449,933 in January plummeting to $12,709 in March, before recovering to $261,042 in April. In contrast, 22Red maintained a more stable ranking, hovering around the mid-20s, which correlates with a steadier sales trajectory. Meanwhile, Halo Cannabis (formerly The Green Halo) improved its rank from 46 in January to 28 in April, indicating a positive growth trend. Additionally, Drip Oils + Extracts emerged in the rankings at position 26 in April, suggesting a potential new competitor in the market. GRAS Cannabis also showed an upward trend, moving from rank 40 in January to 29 in April. These dynamics highlight the competitive pressures PTS faces in the Arizona flower market, emphasizing the need for strategic adjustments to regain and sustain a higher market position.
Notable Products
In April 2025, Champion City Chocolate 14g emerged as the top-performing product for PTS (Progressive Treatment Solutions), achieving the number one rank with a notable sales figure of 3213 units. Orange Soda 3.5g maintained a strong presence, ranking second, slightly down from its first-place position in February. Platinum Punch 14g secured the third rank, indicating its growing popularity. Junior Mac 3.5g followed closely at fourth place, showing a steady performance. Champion City Chocolate 3.5g, which had previously ranked first in March, fell to fifth place, although its sales figures showed a slight increase from the previous month.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.
