.svg){kind=small}
Oct-2026
Sales
Trend
6-Month
Product Count
SKUs
Avg Price
YoY Sales Change
YoY Price Change
Is this your brand?
See your full sales and distribution data: where you sell, how you're priced, and how you rank against the brands next to you on the shelf.
See your brand's dataCarry this brand in your store?
Headset Retailer is free. Connect your POS and see what's selling and what's sitting.
Sign up freeWhere to Buy
Beboe is stocked at 308 licensed dispensaries across Illinois, Maryland, and 9 other states, 71 of them in Illinois, with the deepest coverage in Chicago, Quincy, Metropolis, Mount Vernon, and Normal. Search by ZIP code or city below to find the closest one, or filter by product type if you are after a specific format.
Market Insights Snapshot
Edible holds 81.46% of Beboe’s October 2026 sales mix while Vapor Pens accounts for 18.54%, and the split is shifting further toward Edible as Vapor Pens underperforms. Year over year in October 2026, Edible declined 6.25% versus a steeper 33.62% drop in Vapor Pens, and month over month Edible fell 5.18% while Vapor Pens rose 0.50%, indicating short-term stabilization in a segment with a larger annual contraction. With Edible priced at $15.99 on average versus $33.11 for Vapor Pens and an overall average price decline of 11.68% year over year, the portfolio is tilting toward lower-priced units. The pattern implies Beboe is consolidating around Edible for volume while Vapor Pens contributes marginally to mix with tactical MoM upticks but remains a drag on annual momentum.
Beboe’s heavier reliance on Edible, combined with a 12.91% brand-level year-over-year sales decline and a 39.24% two-year drop, positions the brand as a value-seeking edible player rather than a cross-format breadth leader. The brand sits at rank 13 in Edible in Ohio, suggesting mid-tier placement where incremental gains likely come from mix discipline rather than category expansion, and near-term price moves must balance the 11.68% YoY average price cut against margin. Concentrating on Edible in Maryland—the top state—and reinforcing October 2026 MoM stabilization tactics seen in Vapor Pens without overextending could convert the 0.50% MoM improvement into selective format trial while protecting the 81.46% core. The implication is to treat Vapor Pens as a controlled test bed for elasticity while anchoring positioning in Edible where smaller YoY decline and higher rank relevance can support share preservation.
Competitive Landscape
Beboe sits at rank #15 in MD Edible for October 2026, improving 1 position year over year from #16, but slipping 2 spots versus July 2026 when it was #13; its historical ceiling was rank #10 in March 2025, placing today’s position 5 ranks below that peak. Competitive reshuffling at the top is pronounced: Incredibles climbed from #3 to #1 while growing sales by 35.06%, whereas Wyld fell from #1 to #3 alongside an 18.14% sales decline, indicating that leadership is attainable for movers that couple share capture with velocity; against that backdrop, Beboe’s mild YoY rank gain of 1 alongside a 2-rank slide since July implies a mid-pack position that is stabilizing rather than accelerating, suggesting the current trajectory points to maintenance of teens ranks unless near-term share wins push it back toward the prior #10 peak.
Notable Products
Beboe’s lineup in October 2026 is concentrated in a few items, with the top 10 products accounting for 74.4% of sales and the leading THC/CBG 1:1 Sparkling Pear Cloud 9 Gummies at 14.2%. New launches contributed just 0.1% of sales, so most of its sales come from established products.
Peer avg: average price of the same product type and package size in the same states that month.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.
