.svg){kind=small}
Sep-2026
Sales
Trend
6-Month
Product Count
SKUs
Avg Price
YoY Sales Change
YoY Price Change
Where to Buy
iLava is stocked at 19 licensed dispensaries across Arizona, with the deepest coverage in Tucson, Flagstaff, Mesa, Phoenix, and Apache Junction. Search by ZIP code or city below to find the closest one, or filter by product type if you are after a specific format.
Market Insights Snapshot
In September 2026, iLava’s mix tilted heavily to Vapor Pens at 64.7% share with a -20.4% year-over-year decline and a -14.8% month-over-month drop, while Concentrates held 18.1% share with -26.1% YoY and -7.4% MoM. Edible accounted for 7.9% share with +5.2% YoY and -12.4% MoM, and Flower, though only 5.1% share, surged +35.0% YoY and +37.6% MoM; Topical at 4.1% posted -8.9% YoY and -3.9% MoM. Against an overall brand sales decline of -18.1% YoY and an average price compression of -27.0% YoY, the category picture indicates dependency on a contracting Vapor Pens base and outsized incremental growth from a small Flower footprint. The brand’s Vapor Pens rank at 14 in Arizona places it mid-pack, implying that share defense in the lead category must coexist with selective expansion where momentum exists.
The mix shift implies a repositioning window: outsized MoM and YoY gains in Flower (+37.6% MoM, +35.0% YoY) can be used to counterbalance Vapor Pens contraction (-14.8% MoM, -20.4% YoY), while maintaining Edible’s positive YoY (+5.2%) as a stabilizer despite its -12.4% MoM volatility. With Concentrates declining faster YoY (-26.1%) than the brand overall (-18.1%), reallocating assortment and price architecture away from Concentrates and toward Flower and Edible could reduce revenue drag, especially given a 64.7% Pens concentration that amplifies downside. Given an average price of $14.54 alongside a -27.0% YoY price change, the pattern suggests price-led share capture is insufficient in Vapor Pens at rank 14 in Arizona, and that mix-led positioning—leaning into Flower’s trajectory and preserving Edible’s YoY gain—offers a more durable path.
Competitive Landscape
iLava is ranked #14 in AZ Vapor Pens in September 2026, down 3 positions year over year from #11, and up 2 positions from #16 in June 2026; this sits well below its peak of #8 in November 2024 but indicates a short-term climb alongside a longer-term slide. In contrast, Mfused held #1 with a 4.7% YoY sales lift while Abstrakt advanced from #5 to #2 on 133.9% YoY growth, and Select maintained #3 with 18.4% YoY gains; iLava’s 3-position YoY rank drop versus Abstrakt’s 3-rank climb implies share is consolidating toward faster growers at the top. The pattern—near-term improvement (2-rank rise since June 2026) but multi-quarter erosion (6 ranks below the November 2024 peak)—implies iLava’s trajectory is stabilizing tactically while structurally ceding rank to accelerating leaders.
Notable Products
The steepest decline came from Molecular - Hawaiian Sunkist Live Resin Disposable (1g), down 49.99% month over month and sitting at rank 10, while ClearGold - White Widow Distillate Cartridge (1g) fell 27.05% at rank 9; by contrast, Twilight - CBD/THC/CBG/CBC 1:2:1:1 Blueberry Gummies 10-Pack (50mg CBD, 100mg THC, 50mg CBG, 50mg CBC) rose 16.42% at rank 2. Edibles occupy four of the top ten positions with mixed movement as Entourage Night - CBG/CBN/THC 1:1:2 Wildberry Gummies 10-Pack dipped 3.15% but held rank 1, while Entourage Night - CBG/CBN/THC 1:1:2 Watermelon Gummies 10-Pack fell 23.55% at rank 3. Vapor Pens show sharper volatility with a 27.05% drop at rank 9 and a 49.99% slide at rank 10, even as two other pens with null MoM entered ranks 4 and 6 at a combined $24,908, implying channel resets rather than steady expansion. The pattern implies iLava’s commercial direction is tilting toward stabilizing multi-cannabinoid edibles at the top while pruning or repositioning volatile Vapor Pens SKUs.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.
