.svg){kind=small}
Aug-2026
Sales
Trend
6-Month
Product Count
SKUs
Avg Price
YoY Sales Change
YoY Price Change
Where to Buy
Potters is stocked at 89 licensed dispensaries across California, with the deepest coverage in Los Angeles, San Diego, Sacramento, Vista, and Encinitas. Search by ZIP code or city below to find the closest one, or filter by product type if you are after a specific format.
Market Insights Snapshot
In August 2026, Potters concentrated 81.11% category share in Vapor Pens with a 452.67% year-over-year increase, while Edible held 18.89% share with a 48.01% year-over-year rise; month over month, Vapor Pens declined 12.62% and Edible fell 21.25%. Despite brand-level sales up 264.43% year over year and average price rising 24.25%, Vapor Pens’ average price at $26.72 sat materially above Edible at 14.34, indicating price-led mix lift as rank in California Vapor Pens stood at 74. The pattern implies Potters is over-indexed to Vapor Pens for growth while absorbing short-term monthly pullbacks, and the price gap suggests headroom exists to refine Edible to stabilize month-over-month volatility.
With 81.11% of sales in Vapor Pens and a California Vapor Pens rank of 74, Potters’ positioning hinges on deep penetration of a single category even as both Vapor Pens and Edible posted month-over-month declines of 12.62% and 21.25%, respectively. The 452.67% Vapor Pens year-over-year growth versus 48.01% in Edible, alongside a 24.25% brand-wide average price increase, indicates the portfolio is skewing toward higher-priced inhalables and away from lower-priced form factors, which implies the brand’s future share expansion depends on sustaining Vapor Pens velocity while using Edible selectively to buffer seasonal MoM dips.
Competitive Landscape
Potters ranks #74 in California Vapor Pens in August 2026, improving 92 positions year over year from #166, but slipping 7 spots from its peak of #67 in July 2026; versus three months ago at #123, the 49-rank climb indicates momentum even as the immediate month-over-month dip tempers the pace. Meanwhile, STIIIZY held #1 year over year at #1 despite a 10.9% sales decline, and Jetty Extracts advanced from #4 to #3 with 40.5% sales growth, showing that leadership tiers are consolidating as mid-pack mobility opens; the pattern implies Potters’ rapid ascent is real but requires month-to-month stability to convert a #74 position into a durable top-70 foothold.
Notable Products
The steepest decline in August 2026 came from CBD/CBN/THC 1:1:1 Boysenberry Sugar Free Live Fruit Chews 10-Pack (100mg CBD, 100mg CBN, 100mg THC), which fell 39.9% month over month while holding rank 3, and Dragon Fruit Sugar Free Live Fruit Chews 10-Pack (100mg) dropped 26.5% at rank 4. Three Edible SKUs sit in ranks 3, 4, and 7, but Watermelon Sugar Free Live Fruit Chews 10-Pack (100mg) slid 47.7% MoM at rank 7, indicating concentrated weakness in sugar-free chews even as top Vapor Pens maintained ranks 1 and 2. Vapor Pens also include Cereal Milk Live Resin Disposable (1.25g) at rank 5 with a 21.5% MoM decline, contrasted with Blue Razz Live Resin Disposable (1.25g) at rank 6 down 13.3%, signaling that leadership is held by pens despite mixed momentum. The pattern implies Potters is anchored in Vapor Pens for traffic and share, while the sugar-free chew line needs repositioning or innovation to prevent further mix shift away from Edibles.
Top Selling Cannabis Brands
Data for this report comes from real-time sales reporting by participating cannabis retailers via their point-of-sale systems, which are linked up with Headset’s business intelligence software. Headset’s data is very reliable, as it comes digitally direct from our partner retailers. However, the potential does exist for misreporting in the instance of duplicates, incorrectly classified products, inaccurate entry of products into point-of-sale systems, or even simple human error at the point of purchase. Thus, there is a slight margin of error to consider. Brands listed on this page are ranked in the top twenty within the market and product category by total retail sales volume.
